Developing a User Property Metadata to Support Cognitive and Emotional Product Design
Cognitive and emotional product design is becoming crucial because the technology gap decreases more and more. Product design guidelines and the corresponding database are therefore needed to support sensing (e.g. sight, hearing, touch), cognition (e.g. attention, memory) and emotion (e.g. aesthetics, functionality) which users feel differently according to their genders and ages. The user property information which is extracted from various experiments can be used as critical criteria in product design and evaluation, and it is necessary to develop the integrated database of cognition and emotion where to store the user property information. In this research, we design the user property metadata for supporting cognitive and emotional product design and then develop a prototype system. The metadata is designed to reflect the classification of cognition and emotion by investigating and classifying the previous studies related to sensing, cognition and emotion. The user property information is designed in RDF (Resource Description Framework), and a prototype system is developed to store user property information of cognition and emotion based on the designed metadata.
Apache Jena. https://jena.apache.org/.
Arms, W. Y., Blanchi, C., and Overly, E. A., “An architecture for information in digital libraries,” D-Lib Magazine, Vol. 3. No. 2, 1997.
Barde, J., Libourel, T., and Maurel, P., “A metadata service for integrated management of knowledges related to coastal areas,” Multimedia Tools and Applications, Vol. 25, No. 3, pp. 419-429, 2005.
Ding, L., Finin, T., Joshi, A., Pan, R., Cost, R. S., Peng, Y., and Sachs, J., “Swoogle: a search and metadata engine for the semantic web,” In Proceedings of the 13th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, Washington D.C., 2004.
Gangemi, A., Guarino, N., Masolo, C., Oltramari, A., and Schneider, L., “Sweetening ontologies with DOLCE,” In International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management, Berlin, 2002.
Haynes, D., “Metadata for Information Management and Retrieval,” Facet Publishing, 2004.
Jacob, E. K., “Ontologies and the semantic web,” Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 29, No. 4, pp. 19-22, 2003.
Lee, M.-J., Lee, H.-J., Shim, J.-H. “Analysis and Modeling of Semantic Relationships in e-Catalog Domain”, Journal of Society for e-Business Studies, Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 243-258, 2004.
Miguel López, J., Gil Iranzo, R. M., García González, R., Cearreta, I., & Garay, N. (2008). Towards an ontology for describing emotions. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 5288, pp. 96-104, 2008.
Oh, S., Ahn, J. and Park, J., “Ontology Selection Ranking Model based on Semantic Similarity Approach,” Journal of Society for e-Business Studies, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 95-116, 2009.
RDF Schema. http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-schema/.
Staab, S., Erdmann, M., Maedche, A., and Decker, S., “An Extensible Approach for Modeling Ontologies in RDF(S),” ECDL 2000 Workshop on the Semantic Web, Lisbon, 2000.
Turner, J. A. and Laird, A. R., “The cognitive paradigm ontology: design and application,” Neuroinformatics, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 57-66, 2012.
- There are currently no refbacks.